Search for: "Bose v. Bose"
Results 261 - 277
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
, 443 US 97 (1979), Bose Corporation v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
(Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg) The Supreme Court has just agreed to hear Packingham v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Unsurprisingly, this conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents (such as City of Ladue v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
That type of use is known as “nominative fair use,” and it helps ensure the label on Target’s Up & Up brand shampoo can say “compare to Head and Shoulders®” and the website for Bose headphones can advertise that they are “compatible with most iPod and iPhone models. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
He is also interested in the Consumer Reports question: why does CR get NYT v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Uniloc v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Reed v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:38 pm
(Graham v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am
In Gur Narain Das & Anr. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Andrew G. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Andrew G. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:59 am
POM Wonderful, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Lucent v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
