Search for: "Bose v. Bose"
Results 261 - 277
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
********************************Pamela Chestek comments as follows:In Bose Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:07 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:50 am
Applicant relied on Lands' End Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]GlobalComing out of copyright - some notable deaths from 1937: (IPKat),Design patents: No longer the province of individual inventors: (Patently O),Fail fast, ready fire aim and Stanford v Cal: (IP Think Tank),Walls, Alexander the Great and Partha Bose: (IP Think Tank),A fair use primer for online content creators: (Ars Technica)ISO… [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 4:20 am
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 4:39 am
[TTABlog note: compare this "natural expansion" ruling to last year's questionable Board decision in Bose Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
Farah, Cancellation No. 92032341 [Section 2(d) Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark OMIC PLUS for cosmetics and skin care products based upon Petitioner's alleged prior use of the mark OMIC for cosmetics and skin care products].October 24, 2007 - 2 PM: Bose Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 5:38 am
University of South Carolina, Opposition No. 91125615 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of a stylized SC mark for clothing, based upon Opposer's prior use and registration of the mark SC for clothing and other goods].September 18, 2007 - 2 PM: Bose Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:19 am
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:56 am
On May 3rd (yesterday) the ILB reported on the May 2nd Indiana Supreme Court decision in Paul Joseph "Jay" Kelley, III v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:49 pm
Perhaps the most interesting decision was Hurley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:48 pm
., Serial No. 78246819 [Section 2(d) refusal of SILKY POWDER for clothing ["SILKY" disclaimed], in view of the registered mark POWDER & Design for clothing].March 15, 2007 - 10 AM: Bose Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
He is also interested in the Consumer Reports question: why does CR get NYT v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:48 pm
With that thought in mind, I present the second batch of "worst" decisions of 2006.Bose Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 am
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
