Search for: "Brady Price" Results 261 - 280 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2009, 8:18 pm
The defendants argued that because this is a short-form merger, Kanner can basically do whatever he wants in terms of the price. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:52 am
Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the benefit of his following review of this case. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Since then, other large clients have substantially reduced the number of law firms they use including The Linde Group, Brady Corporation, Pfizer, and Honeywell. [read post]
31 May 2009, 9:20 pm
Despite the somewhat dismal economic conditions, I watched automotive icons from my childhood (and before) fetch rather astonishing sales prices. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:30 am
ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/05-21-2009/0005030797&EDATE = Camp (R-MI), Brady (R-TX) Congratulate Senate Finance Committee for Holding Hearing on U.S. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:30 am
Price, No. 05-30323 (5-21-09). [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:08 am
Kevin Brady, a well respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the benefit of his following review of this Chancery Court decision. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:21 am
Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the benefit of his following review of this case. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:58 pm
Petitioner filed a Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 59(f) and the Court noted that in the briefing, the Respondent had "gloss[ed] over the fact that it agreed with petitioners that the $7.91 conversion price ... should be inserted into Section 8(a) to calculate the conversion ratio. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 pm
 Meanwhile LB Ray Maualuga continues to fall like a federal prosecutor caught holding back Brady material. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:38 am
Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the benefit of his following review of this Delaware Chancery Court decision. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:20 pm
By way of background, the merger price represented a substantial premium over the market price and the merger was approved not only by a disinterested board but also by more than 99% of the voted shares. [read post]