Search for: "Branch v. United States et al"
Results 261 - 280
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 10 a.m. next Monday in Free Enterprise Fund, et al., v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm
Phillips, et al, “New Standard for ‘Move-Aways’ in Child Custody Battles” (October 29, 2009) Daily Journal, p. 6.) [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
In a case of first impression nationally, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:16 am
On Thursday, the Justices are scheduled to examine in their private Conference the case of Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Chrysler LLC (PDF 16 KB)Supplemental Document as Filed by the United States in the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:27 pm
Solicitor General’s brief in opposition in Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
The Respondent contracts with the United States Marshals Service (USMS) to provide security services at federal courthouses. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
(The lead case is Al Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
Muldoon, et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
[et al.]. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
” The ruling came in the case of Kiyemba, et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 6:03 pm
According to today’s opinion from the US District Court of DC, Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
