Search for: "Brown v. Pound"
Results 261 - 280
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2011, 2:58 am
I never expected that to be the moment when he proved his mettle for a seat on the New York Court of Appeals.In Groninger v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm
Commissioner of Social Security New York Social Security Ruling Underscores Importance of Treating Physician Testimony: Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:42 am
DC v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:32 am
In State v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” He cited four privacy cases – McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73; HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57; Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103; and Murray v Express Newspapers [2009] Ch 481 – where the House of Lords had refused to grant permission to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
And Lord Brown expressed his concern at the majority view, observing that the ordinary “man in the street’ would ‘be appalled’ at the majority interpretation of Section 133 which, in his words would not infrequently result in the compensation of the guilty, sometimes …to the extent of hundreds of thousands of pounds. [277] The Court considered a number of Strasbourg cases, all endorsing the general principle that it is not open to the state to… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
The Court determined that the ALJ arbitrarily dismissed the physician's reports, which indicated that Brown could lift no more than five pounds and could not stand for long periods of time, and instead placed far greater importance on one-time evaluations by SSA and Postal Service medical experts. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
In Siemer v Stiassny [2011] NZCA 106 the New Zealand Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against an award of defamation damages of totalling NZ$825,000 (£418,000) to the first respondent and NZ$75,000 (£36,000) to the second respondent. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
" Mr Beesley, a property developer who carried out a "deliberate, elaborate and sustained plan" to outwit planners has finally lost a legal battle over the £500,000 home he built disguised as a hay barn. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
" Mr Beesley, a property developer who carried out a "deliberate, elaborate and sustained plan" to outwit planners has finally lost a legal battle over the £500,000 home he built disguised as a hay barn. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Both were awarded nominal damages of £1. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Since the appellants have suffered no loss they should recover no more than nominal damages of £1: [90]-[96]. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Since the appellants have suffered no loss they should recover no more than nominal damages of £1. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
Aviva had, by this stage, agreed to contribute £1,500 per week for Mr Brown to rent reasonable temporary accommodation. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am
She ordered the claimant to pay £25,000 costs on account in 28 days On 25 February 2011, Tugendhat J heard the defendant’s summary judgment application in the case of Cook v Telegraph Media Group. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Preface… Before I jump into this decision by a U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 5:23 am
£150,000. [read post]
