Search for: "Brown v. U. S" Results 261 - 280 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
The 2022-2023 term was also notable as it was the Court’s first with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson serving on its bench. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:01 pm by Will Baude
In distinguishing away yet another one of the Court's territoriality dormant Commerce Clause cases, the Court writes: Beyond Baldwin, Brown-Forman, and Healy, petitioners point to Edgar v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Jackson is also often quoted for his statement about the Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
This practice did not end until well after the Supreme Court struck down race-based school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by Andrew Koppelman
The Equal Protection Clause is the reason the Court has struck down laws that impose certain inequalities, such as the race discrimination that was challenged in Brown v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am by Moseley Collins
[U]nlike the defendants in Kennemur and Jones, and Bonds, defendants in this case had the opportunity to take Brown's deposition in light of his changed opinion and prepare for cross-examination and rebuttal of his testimony. [read post]