Search for: "Browning v. U.s.*" Results 261 - 280 of 1,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
” Substantive Rulemaking is Broadly Defined: The district court defines a “substantive rule” as any rule that “affect[s] individual rights and obligations” (Quoting Chrysler Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:22 pm
For the following reasons, we affirm Brown's sentence. 07a0358p.06 2007/09/04 Ferensic v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Thomas cited last year's decision in Brown v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Because Brown is not entitled to relief, we AFFIRM. 07a0321p.06 2007/08/16 USA v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:33 am
I.R.S., 915 F.2d 1230, 1235-36 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1096, 111 S.Ct. 986, 112 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1991)) (holding that § 1927 is applicable to pro se plaintiffs); see also Brown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:15 pm
Brown, 36 F.Supp.2d 922, 931-32 (D.N.M.1999) (holding that the INS owes plaintiff a duty to process her application for a change of status to permanent resident); with Elzerw v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:34 am
I.R.S., 915 F.2d 1230, 1235-36 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1096, 111 S.Ct. 986, 112 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1991)) (holding that § 1927 is applicable to pro se plaintiffs); see also Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:57 am
The Roberts Court declared in Brown v Chamber of Commerce last term that California could not place anti-union-busting conditions on California's own state money. [read post]