Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 261 - 280
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2015, 6:33 am
Further Reading: Ackerman, Bruce, Anne Alstott, Philippe van Parijs, et al. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
From Balkinization: Bruce Ackerman (Yale Law School) on "The Original Understanding of the Sixteenth Amendment. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme CourtApril 18, 2022Balkinization Symposium on Richard Hasen, Cheap Speech: How Disinformation Poisons Our Politics-and How to Cure It (Yale University Press, 2022).March 31, 2022Balkinization Symposium on Dan Carpenter, Democracy by Petition: Popular Politics in Transformation, 1790–1870 (Harvard University Press, 2021).March 20, 2022Balkinization Symposium on Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric's new book Power to the People:… [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
In the legal academic literature, the leading example of this critique was a 1985 Harvard Law Review article by Bruce Ackerman called Beyond Carolene Products, in which Ackerman explains why discrete and insular minorities may, by virtue of those characteristics, be better positioned to advance their interests through the political process than are inchoate, diffuse majorities. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In dueling Harvard Law Review articles in 1995, Professor Laurence Tribe debated these issues with Professors Bruce Ackerman and David Golove. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:49 pm
Professor Ackerman's theory is more complex than this short description - it requires the book length treatment he has given it. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:29 am
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman and Congressman David Wu describe another: The real debate on Iraq begins with Congress's consideration of the military budget. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:56 pm
Or perhaps Ackerman and Kiel are positing that Gonzales is just bad at covering up for the Administration. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:17 pm
The absolute neutrality toward all conceptions of the good proposed by Ronald Dworkin and Bruce Ackerman are only one available flavor of neutrality.The range of possible justifications for any version of neutrality is broad. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
Times, Bruce Ackerman proposes creating a presidential commission on civil-military relations tasked with formulating a new canon of military ethics to clarify principles of constitutional governance in the modern world, and writes about these issues in his forthcoming book. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:03 am
And mind you I'm not talking only about some Bruce Ackerman constitutional moment argument here. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 2:59 pm
"--Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale University [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:51 pm
In the past year, Slate has run stories by Bruce Ackerman, Ahkil Amar, Frank Bowman, Bill Eskridge, David Fontana, Richard Thompson Ford, Bennett Gershman, Jack Goldsmith, Rick Hasen Orin Kerr, Neal Katyal, Marty Lederman, Eric Posner, Jamin Raskin, Jim Ryan and Kenji Yoshino (and I'm sure I missed a few too). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:49 am
(See, for example, Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman's criticism. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:26 am
John Yoo is, of course, full of it, as Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman explained: BA: The president has to get another authorization for a war against Iran. [read post]
