Search for: "Bullet v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
(The defendant here was admitted on a tourist visa, but came to the United States pretty much weekly.) [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In Mohammad v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm
After noticing one of the men was still alive, the defendant left to search for more bullets and ultimately tried to return to the scene with a knife. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm
"] Today the Court heard oral argument in Torres v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
This week, in Torres v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
In the oral argument of Torres v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
Madrid and Pereida v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 12:34 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
In fact, this is exactly what happened in the recent New York case of Ferreira v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
United States, 370 U.S. 294, 326, 82 S. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Wegman’s book is replete with short sentences, brief paragraphs, and bursts of rhetorical questions and bullet points to speedy his story along. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:10 pm
" The statute was amended in 1963 … to delete the presumption in light of State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:14 pm
The rule of State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
The case is entitled Ortiz et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
Josh Gerstein (Politico) has the story, with a link to the Judicial Conference of the United States letter laying out the request, including (bullets added): 2. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Also, a soft circuit-split: the Sixth Circuit breaks with the Eleventh in electing to spell Anderson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:00 am
Tyburski v. [read post]
