Search for: "C. Davis v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Christopher Novus Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In the same way that Collins is undermined by the subequent decisions in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015), so Murphy is undermined by the subsequent decisions in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) and Case… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:04 pm
Patty[Affirmed; Luckert; July 24, 2020]Prosecutorial error in closing argument (burden shifting)State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sanders and Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 10:22 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
(Added L.2005, c. 671, § 3, eff. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
Mirow (Florida International University); Daniel Lord Smail (Harvard University); David V. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
Davis, 237 N.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court wrote in Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 12:06 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 12:11 pm
Davis[Reversed; Biles; January 24, 2020]Insufficient evidence of "dwelling" to prove residential burglaryState v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Such is the case in Allen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Because of the limited punishments that can be imposed, "[c]riminal defamation defendants are not entitled to a trial by jury" and "state law does not afford indigent criminal defamation defendants the right to court-appointed counsel. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm
The following year the court ruled on a student’s claim of sexual harassment by another student in Davis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Findings of fact 8 and 10 state: 8. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
