Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 3:06 pm
But it may not matter. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:11 pm
See Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, Case Number: G 0002/06. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:56 pm
By Carmelina G. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
Posted by Nancy G. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am
Under proposed 285(c)(1)(G)(2)(A), an interested party is anyone with an interest, including employees. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
The matter then went to the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:18 am
In re V & C, LLC, Serial No. 86321427 (May 8, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos).Mere Descriptiveness: The Board has held that Italian is a common modern language for purposes of the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:02 am
g. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
— William G. [read post]
12 May 2011, 4:56 am
Anyone can probate their own matter but sometimes a qualified and experienced probate attorney can be indispensable in order to save time, avoid mistakes and bring about the desired results. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:03 pm
In a piece for Bloomberg Law last year, prominent intellectual property attorney David G. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 7:38 pm
Perspectives de droit comparé (Céline Castets-Renard, Jessica Eynard, eds.) which should be forthcoming shortly. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:39 am
The CJEU looked into the relationship between trade marks and mathematical shapes in the Gömböc case (C-237/19). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
” [2.10] Thus, although the appellant cited G 2/92 to support its view that this opinion exclusively concerned the prohibition of pursuing a non-unitary application in respect of subject-matter in respect of which no search fees had been paid and did not concern the examination procedure and subject-matter for which the search fees have been paid, the scope of G 2/92 extends – as explained supra – beyond the… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
By Thomas G. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm
Most recently, the First District Court of Appeal issued an April 17, 2012 opinion in a matter addressing this very issue in William G. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:35 am
Justice Brown felt that he could not hear the matter without greater particularization of the accounts. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
G 2/10, as I understand it, states that under more general conditions, the only thing that matters is that what is claimed in the end complies with A 123(2). [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
In late February, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its long-awaited [the Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek, on which see here, had been released in July 2019] judgment in Constantin Film, C-240/18 P, aka the Fack Ju Göhte case concerning the interpretation of the morality absolute ground in EU trade mark (EUTM) law.The decision is both interesting and important for a number of reasons, including trade mark law, the role of freedom of expression,… [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
matter concerned. [read post]
