Search for: "C. R.C. C."
Results 261 - 280
of 319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2012, 4:25 pm
R.C. 5739.01(H)(1)(c)(v). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:55 am
Just last month the Court of Appeals of Ohio affirmed the convictions of a business owner for three counts of false representation in the registration of securities, and one count each of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, tampering with records, and falsification, but reverse the remainder of his convictions. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
Then, to justify the consecutive sentence it selected, the court must articulate why it made any of the conclusory findings it made, having reference to the policy purposes of felony sentencing in R.C. 2929.11 and the applicable seriousness and recidivism factors in R.C. 2929.12. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:11 am
Federal Law: The term “disability” means, with respect to an individual — (A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of such individual; (B) a record of such an impairment; or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
De un lado, se apoya en distinguir el núcleo duro de la discrecionalidad técnica (criterio de fondo del Tribunal Calificador: decidir si la respuesta es correcta o no) y los “aledaños”( condiciones o pasos instrumentales para tomar la decisión y que deben aplicarse bajo un triple parámetro de contro: a) La convocatoria; b)Las condiciones de igualdad para los aspirantes; c) La motivación). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am
The first sentence of Criminal Rule 32(C) seems pretty simple: “A judgment of conviction shall set forth the plea, the verdict, or findings, upon which each conviction is based, and the sentence. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm
Now, let us consider the maintainability of the review petition filed before the High Court after dismissal of SLP (C) No. 10939 of 2008 before this Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:28 am
See R.C. 5321.20(C). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:59 am
The court’s syllabus says it all, at least as far as I’m concerned — “the exemption from township zoning in R.C. 519.21(A) does not require for its application that viticulture be the primary use of property engaged in the vinting and selling of wine” — and so, with our vocabulary suitably expanded, we move on. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
LEXIS 9029 (5th Cir 5/3/2011) On return from remand relief denied on: [A] “whether the district court erred or otherwise abused its discretion in the manner in which it conducted the renewed Batson hearing after our remand so as to deprive Barnette of fundamental fairness, and specifically by: (1) reviewing the government’s annotated copies of juror questionnaires in camera and refusing to order their disclosure to Barnette; (2) refusing to provide clean copies of the questionnaires to… [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:00 am
R.C. 3105.171(C). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
This decision is a rare interpretation of the 2006 amendment to R.C. 4123.01(C) regarding compensable injuries. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:24 pm
Possession of marijuana, a violation of R.C. 2925.11(C)(3)(a), is a minor misdemeanor. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:33 pm
John C. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
It has been rightly considered by this Court in R.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Justice LahotiThe Bench comprising Justice Thomas, Justice Mohapatra and Justice R.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:55 am
Justice LahotiJustice R.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Thus, the trial judge must personally review and evaluate the appropriateness of the death penalty, prepare an entirely new sentencing entry as required by R.C. 2929.03(F), and conduct whatever other proceedings are required by law and consistent with this opinion. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
R.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
App. 2007) (adopting Restatement Third §2(c) regarding warnings; “[a]bsent controlling Arizona law to the contrary, we generally follow the Restatement”); Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. [read post]
