Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 261 - 280
of 62,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 2:55 am
c. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:25 am
: on R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin). [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
CFPB v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:31 am
Susan V. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:00 am
C. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:45 pm
In fact, there are three key takeaways in Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Case 1: Baldessari Trust v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:02 pm
Luthmann v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
James C. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:17 pm
C.R. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:38 pm
R. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:14 pm
(Understanding, of course, that justices get to decide for themselves whether their opinions allegedly meet the standards for publication established by Rule 8.1105(c), and that different justices sometimes have markedly different subjective tastes in this regard.) [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
APRA Sec. 13(c)(1)(B)(vi)(IV)&(V). [read post]