Search for: "CALIFORNIANS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 261 - 280
of 590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Supreme Court in Furman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
" The doctrine, which makes orders denying motions for class certification immediately appealable, was originally adopted by the California Supreme Court in Daar v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
City of Riverside v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:32 pm
Moreover, the state minimum wage law protects Californians by keeping California “families above the poverty line. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
" (In re Tobacco II Cases, supra, at p. 324; Californians for Disability Rights v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
As a federal judge, Ware has presided over some notable cases, such as Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm
That is routine (as evidenced by the many Prop 64 cases that were handed down while Californians for Disability Rights v Meryvn’s was pending). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:59 am
“This is a big win for transparency in California,” attorney Peter Bibring, director of police practices at the ACLU of Southern California, which joined EFF in a lawsuit over the records. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Code, § 17203, as amended by Prop. 64, § 2; see also Californians for Disability Rights v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:26 pm
The case we always cite in California is Stangvik v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:40 am
Butcher v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:59 pm
Lyft, Inc., litigation pending in the Northern District of California. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:47 pm
In Anderson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:47 pm
In Anderson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 2:08 am
(via Out-Law) Browse-wrap agreements have received yet another boost in the United States in the case of Cohn v Truebeginnings. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:35 pm
This question was recently answered by the Court of Appeal in Olive Lane Industrial Park v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 5:03 am
Maybe it makes no sense, perhaps it drives non-Californians crazy, but that's the way it is.The case is Rodas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
I think this week’s ruling in Burdick v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:35 pm
In AT & T Mobility v. [read post]
