Search for: "CARTER V. THOMAS" Results 261 - 280 of 292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
The Ninth Circuit takes the case en banc after the panel issues a majority opinion authored by a Bush II appointee (Judge Clifton) that finds no constitutional violation over the dissent of a Clinton appointee (Judge Thomas). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
LAMPMAN; from Bosque County; 10th district (10-06-00096-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-08-07)[Concurrence in 10-06-00096-CV]07-1038 ALINDA FRANCINE CARTER-THOMAS v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:11 pm
" Sullivan asked Solicitor General Thomas Fisher. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Innovationpartners), ICANN reforms threaten voice of IP owners: (Managing Intellectual Property), INTA 130th annual meeting – a report: (IPKat), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IAM), INTA’s online Committee Portal premiers: (Managing Intellectual Property), Hans Van Bylen tells how careful brand management and exploitation of ‘glocal’ products helped Henkel become global player: (Managing Intellectual Property), Records number of IP owners applied for… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
For starters, McCain undoubtedly will tap into the bucket of Bush I and Bush II appointees, who in general are more hostile to civil liberties than those who served under Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 12:06 pm
Circuit City was represented by veteran Supreme Court advocate Carter G. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 7:34 am
Attorneys for Review Board, et al.; Steve Carter, Thomas Fisher, Heather Hagan and Elizabeth Rogers all of Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Miller Brewing Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 9:04 am
Three Supreme Court / IP veterans are handling the oral arguments: Maureen Mahoney (Quanta); Thomas Hungar (DOJ); Carter Phillips (LGE, patentee). [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
Maureen Mahoney of Washington, D.C., and Thomas Hungar of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the petitioner, and Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent. [read post]