Search for: "CLARK V US" Results 261 - 280 of 3,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The plaintiff argued that the regular use eExclusion was unenforceable under the Gallagher v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
Horsham Properties Group Ltd v (1) Paul Clark (2) Carol Beech and GMAC RFC Ltd (Third Party) and The Secretary of State for Justice (Intervener) [2008] EWHC 2327 (Ch) Now this is a complicated little case which, I suspect, will give rise to more questions (and litigation) than it answered. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
  In District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
However, I was blown away by Scott Heiser’s presentation during the panel, The People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:05 am by Bill Marler
Coronet (Blair County Civil Div No. 2004GN5396), largest salmonella outbreak in US restaurant industry history; and Foodmaker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
A claim in passing off could therefore not be sustained to protect goodwill that any reasonable person would consider to be trivial (Laddie J in Sutherland v V2 Music Ltd, [22]).Wenman claimed that her business was small but profitable, and that she had, since 2010, used the signs in question as descriptors of herself and the services she provided.In light of the evidence and submissions presented, HHJ Clarke was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the columns… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:51 am by Dennis Crouch
The US Patent world continues to await the Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Running from Monday 21 May until Thursday 24 May 2012 is the appeal of Rubin & anor v Eurofinance SA & ors, to be heard in Courtroom 1 of the Supreme Court by Lords Walker, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Collins. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am by CMS
Clarke LJ held, applying the principles in Cory v Burr (1883) 8 App Cas 393 and Wayne Tank and Pump Company Ltd v Employers Liability Assurance Corporation Ltd [1974] 1 QB 57, where there are two proximate causes, one that is covered and the other subject to an exclusion, liability will not arise. [read post]