Search for: "CUSTODY OF M D" Results 261 - 280 of 1,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2018, 9:08 am
  And, on that point, I'm not entirely certain that section D of this opinion is entirely persuasive. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
(As is customary, I’d like to note that my views are my own as SEC Chair, and I’m not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the SEC staff.) [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 6:37 am by Andrew Frisch
After a hearing on the matter, this Court found that sanctions were warranted against Defendants and Defendants’ counsel for their failure to comply with the Court’s order, but held the sanctions in abeyance so long as Defendants produced all relevant documents in their possession, custody, or control by March 21, 2016. [read post]
19 May 2008, 10:57 pm
" "Everybody involved here has a right to good counsel," said Ogden, "and I'm not sure you're going to get that if everybody has to work for free. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:54 am
And I'm a little surprised the court didn't publish on its own. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
Gaynor, 2008 WL 113653 (D. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Gibb, Attorney for Appellee JUDGE KATE APPLEBY authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES JILL M. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 11:42 am
  I'm glad that the writers didn't have the CTU team stop the detonation at the last second. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 1:40 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 1:40 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Russell Knight
Section 508 just refers back to Section 501…so I’m not even sure why Section 506 refers to Section 508. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:39 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Bobby Zirkin, D-Baltimore County wants to allow couples who enter into mutual agreements covering the issues commonly litigated in contested divorce cases—alimony, equitable distribution and custody—to bypass the one-year separation requirement. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:38 pm by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]