Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 10:36 pm
Third, don’t put your company in a position to be accused of per se antitrust violations like price-fixing, market allocation, and bid-rigging. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
The watches were sold by Costco for 35% less than Omega’s suggested retail price (p.19) and “price” is also a component of the marketing mix. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:55 am
”The lawsuit alleges AT&T violated the Federal Communications Act and engaged in deceptive practices under California’s unfair competition law, as AT&T deceived customers into believing that the company was protecting their location data. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
But the court keeps talking: “because of the Internet’s—and Apple’s Appstore, in particular—ubiquity with everyday life, users are more likely to believe that all companies are available in the Appstore. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:17 pm
California rejected another attempt by the class action bar to extend the already questionable fraud-on-the-market theory from Basic v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Le v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 5, 2024, a jury in California federal court found a former corporate executive liable for insider trading in SEC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
The case was then remanded to the Northern District of California for further proceedings. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
Amidst historically low oil prices and economic shutdowns, fossil fuel companies continue to defend against lawsuits brought by state and local governments claiming climate-change related damages. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
Case citation: Roca Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
The plaintiffs allege that the company had participated in an illegal conspiracy to fix the prices of Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) and then misrepresented the company’s financial condition as a result of the artificially inflated DRAM prices. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, L’anza Research International, a California shampoo company, sold to foreign distributors at rates which were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
In Amerigraphics v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:00 pm
In Metro Premium Wines v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:02 am
Pirani v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:01 pm
(See, for example, Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
The court found that the second amended complaint had sufficient allegations that the companies made an agreement in 2003 to stop competing with each other and to set market prices. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
One week ago, the Federal Circuit issued a ruling that was more than surprising: a majority of the full court overruled the three panel judges, including the Chief Judge, with respect to the second California Apple v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:38 pm
To defray these costs, companies may raise prices, limit hours, or relocate work to other states and countries. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 11:45 am
Berrin v. [read post]
