Search for: "California v. American Stores"
Results 261 - 280
of 802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Walmart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm
Advocacy group for the blind sues the Container Store, alleging that the company's use of touch-screen point-of-sale devices—which are inaccessible to blind customers—violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:26 am
., Kaplan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am
Hargan, in which he would have delayed an undocumented teen’s ability to receive an abortion, “offers a clue about what’s in store for American women if he’s confirmed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
The origin of this case was a renovation that added an inaccessible mezzanine to the store. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:57 pm
(Ted) Frech III, a Professor of Economics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, in the American Bar Association book, Antitrust Law and Economics of Product Distribution (2d ed.). [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Heller Justice Scalia looked to history to determine that the Second Amendment guarantees to Americans the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense purposes. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
Swiftly, the gun control lobbies began warning Americans about the "plastic pistol. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
Fully 95 percent of Americans own cell phones; 77 percent, smartphones. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
CCPA’s sales restrictions raise First Amendment concerns In Sorrell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
§ 2511) contains a one-party consent rule, a dozen states have a two-party consent that supersedes American Federal law, and given its presence in California (Cal. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am
What is in store for us in a post-GDPR world? [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:51 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
You would have had to wait until 1967, in Katz v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:56 am
The case is Facebook, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
Adam Winkler is a professor of law at the University of California at Los Angeles. [read post]
