Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 261 - 280
of 34,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 2:33 pm
By:David Gabor On December 30, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeals, in Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Contrary to popular perception, California law does not bar all restrictive covenants in the employment context. [read post]
2 Jun 2006, 11:17 am
On May 31, 2006, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, in Haberbush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2006, 11:17 am
On May 31, 2006, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, in Haberbush v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
The deciding factor was California's strong public policy that I have discussed often, which bars non-competes for employees.Conversely, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed a slightly different question in NuVasive, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 7:14 am
" Instead, the legislation is intended to trump the California Supreme Court's decision in People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 1:16 pm
In Foothills Christian Church v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Independent Living Center of Southern California [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the parties to the suit could return to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] to argue in the first instance whether Medicaid recipients and providers could maintain Supremacy Clause actions challenging a California state law that reduces reimbursement rates. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
As noted in my last blog post, the California Supreme Court just reversed the appellate court decision in the case of Steiner v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 12:40 pm
That may be the situation with the new California Court of Appeal decision in Bowman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:57 am
That Act was the basis for the lawsuit in Aguayo v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:37 pm
The California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Mendoza v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
(opinion available here), the court briefly addressed Concepcion and unmistakably held that Concepcion does not preempt all California contractual unconscionability law. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
On June 13, 2012, the California Supreme Court unanimously denied review in the case of California Society of Anesthesiologists v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:35 am
In 2018, the Supreme Court of California turned much of the established law regarding worker classification on its head with its decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:18 pm
For example, a California court held in Ajamian v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
As we have previously written, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 8:00 am
In Golden v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
In American Nurses Ass’n v. [read post]
