Search for: "Case Under Seal" Results 261 - 280 of 6,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2014, 12:14 am by Sungjoon Cho
 In a nutshell, the AB integrated two strands of case law on the chapeau test (one in Gasoline/Shrimp-Turtle and the other in Brazil-Tyres), while it denied (at least in a formalist sense) the convergence of the “evenhandedness” test under TBT Article 2.1 with the chapeau test under GATT Article XX. [read post]
1 May 2007, 5:12 am
Rather, defense and plaintiff attorneys believed that the trial court had stated a separate motion need not be filed whenever a party wished to file documents under seal; rather, the parties could "file documents 'conditionally under seal' pursuant to the Protective Order and, unless an objection was made, the documents were deemed filed under seal. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
Courts routinely deny requests to seal cases asserting similar concerns. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:32 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Just days ago, I characterized courts as being “skeptical” of relators’ requests to seal their dismissed False Claims Act qui tams cases when the government declines to intervene. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:27 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
However, surveillance matters filed in the federal courts often remain under seal indefinitely, long past any need for secrecy - a topic another colleague of mine, retired magistrate judge Stephen Wm. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:57 am by John L. Welch
District of Columbia: The District took a very different approach, asserting that to deny it registration for its seal would violate the obligations of the United States under the Paris Convention. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
  The records must then be destroyed unless the original sealing order requires them to be kept under seal beyond that time. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:17 am by The Docket Navigator
The court denied without prejudice the parties' applications to file documents related to a motion for preliminary injunction under seal where there was an exceptionally strong public interest. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
Smith cautioned, however:[T]he new way we handle things will be prospective, as we have no way of knowing what cases were previously handled under the "old" way before I changed our practice. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:27 am
The decision makes for a good primer on what it now takes to seal, and unseal, court records under Florida law. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 5:47 am by Bob Kraft
Sealed records remain in existence but become restricted from public view and are only accessible under specific circumstances to state agencies or with a court order. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
This is how the ordinance, and the case, arose: Fluvanna County is authorized by the [Virginia] Commonwealth to have a county seal. . . . [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
[“But increasingly, courts are sealing documents in run-of-the-mill cases where the parties simply prefer to keep things under wraps. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:56 pm by Robert Rhoad
A relator filing a qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act must file it under seal, see 31 U.S.C. 3739(b)(2), giving the government an opportunity to investigate the allegations. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Trial judges, like Theresa Slade in Douglas County District Court, who is presiding over the Erickson murder case, have been given essentially unfettered "discretion" to seal their court files. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 4:46 am by Andrew Keane Woods
  This is the standard practice in such cases – indeed, we do not have complete information about how other firms react to similar requests precisely because the requests typically come under seal. [read post]
30 May 2019, 10:46 am by Mike Worgul
The authorities are currently working on an automatic sealing procedure that will take care of your case without you or your lawyer having to do a thing. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under "the First Amendment and the common law," the public has a "presumption of access to judicial records. [read post]