Search for: "Chambers v State"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On 14 July 2023, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Chinese state broadcaster’s international division, China Global Television Network (CGTN), against a £125,000 fine handed down by Ofcom, Star China Media Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Office of Communications [2023] EWCA Civ 843. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:28 am
Enforcement Update & Priorities Also on July 14th, the CPPA held a public meeting that in part responded to the recent Superior Court decision in California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 4:21 pm
Vidal v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 4:13 am
See Rippo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
In Doe I v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
We had a comment on the Chamber decision in 2021. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am
Jehovah’s Witnesses and blood transfusions The Chamber of the ECtHR to which Pindo Mulla v Spain (application no. 15541/20) had been allocated has relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:29 am
Huawei v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There has been previous comment here on the various stages of Banks v Cadwalladr, and the facts have been well-stated. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:09 pm
Were the memos circulated to the Jackson chambers likewise redacted? [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The Grand Chamber judgment also refers to the ECtHR’s approach in Delfi AS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In the state case of California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce has called the proposed rule “blatantly unlawful” and an attack on “well-established state laws,” and has said it is prepared to go to court if the rule is adopted. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
Hicks v. [read post]
