Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration"
Results 261 - 280
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
Grovo, — F.3d —, 2016 WL 3443691 (9th Cir. 2016) (restitution in child porn cases) In United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
” So, how is it possible for the Supreme Court to hold that Article 3(1) of the CRC gives rise to a right to social security benefit, but Article 3(2) does not permit a legislative measure to promote children’s well-being? [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The fieldfisher Privacy, Security and Information law blog examines the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee’s report on Cyber Security: Protection of Personal Data Online. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
It reveals both the unifying strength of these normative tropes--as symbol--and their fracture and technicity as administrative technique and intergovernmental politics. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:50 am
" It was added to the Social Security Act through the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Rather, the law makes it a crime for any registered sex offender to either post to such a site or even read it, on the theory that the law is needed “to prevent registered sex offenders from prowling on social media and gathering information about potential child targets. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
Union, Local 25 v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 5:14 pm
” The Veterans Administration (past and present) and the Social Security Administration (prospectively) are theaters of operations for large expansions of firearms prohibitions without congressional consent. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm
I’ve noted before there are legitimate bases for measures such as domain name seizure, website blocking, and criminal penalties for certain uses of websites (such as child abuse and harassment). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm
In light of the foregoing Federal and state statutes and regulations, it is clear that Hammond did not jeopardize her own eligibility for Medicaid by transferring her monthly income into the SNT for the benefit of her son, who was both disabled and under 65 years of age (see Reames v State of Oklahoma, 411 F3d at 1164; Estate Planning for a Family with a Special Needs Child, 23 Probate & Property at 16). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Mueller 15-574Issue: Whether the Social Security Act’s anti-assignment provision bars a state court from considering in any manner future Social Security payments in dividing marital property upon divorce. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
As was stated in Re P(DM) v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Weaver v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 8:04 am
But the statute also provides that an alien who is “lawfully present” in the country is eligible to receive Social Security benefits as well as benefits under the supplemental security income program. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Weaver v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
The article followed a couple that went to the Social Security Administration (SSA) office to deal with an issue involving their Social Security Old Age and Retirement benefits. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
The government response was the enactment of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and made financial reporting obligatory for public corporations. [read post]
