Search for: "Christopher v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
In his remarks on the amendment, Hutchinson indicated that it was designed to address “the growing threat that the People’s Republic of China poses to the citizens of the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
They lashed out against other units and the government. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 8:34 am
Jason Rantanen In United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm
” This self-appointed task has a huge influence on the development of the law in the United States, and indeed around the world, mostly for the better. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
As FBI Director Christopher Wray has stated regarding China’s threat to national security, “If you are an American adult, it is more likely than not that China has stolen your personal data. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Department or Homeland Security issued a “National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin,” warning of, “a heightened threat environment across the United States,” and, “violent riots have continued in recent days,” and, “ideologically-motivated actors” could incite further violence. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
& Christopher R. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:08 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
In 1986 a federal grand jury indicted Raymond Luc Levasseur, Christopher E. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am
Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution says, “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am
Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution says, “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:07 pm
The article discusses the divergences between various states in their interpretation of CJEU jurisprudence and the importance of the – then – upcoming judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am
On Oct. 13, the Artemis Accords Principles for a Safe, Peaceful, and Prosperous Future, commonly referred to as the Artemis Accords, were signed by their eight founding member states: Australia, Canada, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
