Search for: "Chrysler Corporation" Results 261 - 280 of 541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2010, 10:01 am by Larry Ribstein
Think Sears Brands, LLC and Chrysler Group LLC. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:36 am by Stephen Lubben
Everyone seems to be missing the basic point that corporate debtors never consider the plight of their creditors. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:05 am by Milord A. Keshishian
Santa Ana, CA – Kruse Technology has filed a patent infringement suit against Defendants Daimler AG; Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC; Detroit Diesel Corporation; Freightliner Corporation; Western Star Truck Sales, Inc.; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Audi of America, Inc.; Ford Motor Company; Cummins Inc.; and Chrysler Group LLC. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:58 pm by Mandelman
The advent of limited liability corporations and the legal ‘personhood’ of corporate shells have allowed business to create one sided bets for years, and they happily walk away from “corporate debt” when the tide shifts. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:08 am
Both individuals and corporations often file for chapter 11 bankruptcy. [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:26 pm by Hank Fasthoff
  After all, HUJ says that it has extensively licensed Einstein’s intellectual property rights, including to companies such as “Apple Computer, Bell Atlantic, Citibank, Columbia Pictures, Daimler-Chrysler, Dell Computers, Deloitte LLP, Disney, Dow Jones & Company, Eastman Kodak, Einstein Noah Bagel Corporation, Epson, France Telecom, Hyundai Motor Company, IBM, Intel Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Kraft Foods, LegoLand, Mars, Microsoft, NASA,… [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court W D Wisconsin: Motion to stay pending the Federal Circuit’s decision denied in false marking case: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:25 am by Socrates & Cassandra
  BAE, Daimsler-Chrysler and Siemens) are adequate, they frankly are wrong. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(Maier & Maier) (IP Law Blog) Pacific Pictures Corporation – Superman: the never ending lawsuit: DC Comics v Pacific Pictures Corporation et al (Trademark Blog) Taflove – District Court N D Illinois will not amend summary judgement based upon ‘new’ evidence: Ho v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:14 am by law shucks
Related posts:Jumping In(House): Headhunters W&C Partner Stirs Up White House/Chrysler Tiff Pushing or Jumping from Howrey? [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:42 am by Moseley Collins
Chrysler Corporation (1981) 115 Cal.App.3d 755, 764 [plaintiff is required to introduce evidence that plaintiff relied on the ostensible authority of the agent without want of ordinary care. ].) [read post]
The very possibility of a corporate turnaround has encouraged investors to take risk in buying discounted equity and debt in restructurings, where there would be far less interest in asset trading in liquidations. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog is hosting a debate over a new paper, Ambiguity About Ambiguity: An Empirical Inquiry Into Legal Interpretation written by Ward Farnsworth, Dustin F. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:02 am by Michael Fitzgibbon
Chrysler Canada where the Tribunal removed three (3) personal respondents from the application.These are important cases and ones that establish a principled approach to dealing with this important issue. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:28 pm by Anna Christensen
Soler Chrysler Plymouth (1985), in which the Court has held that determinations regarding the validity and enforceability of arbitration agreements under Section 2 of the FAA are for the courts, rather than the arbitrator, to decide. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm by Randall Reese
Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership and Legends Gaming of Louisiana, LLC Charter Communications, LLC Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC Pacific Lumber Company Chrysler LLC Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC The April 2010 Insolvency Notes can be found on White & Case's website. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:43 am by Greenberg & Bederman
So you would think that after all of this, the Toyota Corporation has learned its lesson, right? [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:06 am by Matt Johnston
Kearns, representing himself, sued Ford, GM and Chrysler and won for patent infringement. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:23 pm by Mae Kuykendall
  The general subject is the impact of GM/Chrysler failure on the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PGBC") and the conflict inherent in the government's role as shareholder. [read post]