Search for: "Church v. Grant County" Results 261 - 280 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm by Amy Howe
The plaintiffs in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Worldwide Church of God (1987) 197 Cal.App.3d 363, 375. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am by Lovechilde
 These how we invested in community colleges and land grant colleges like Michigan State....So the people in Flint, and across Michigan, and around the country -- individuals and church groups and non-for-profits and community organizations -- you've proven that the American people will step up when required. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
”Although many Americans associate polygamy with mainstream Mormonism, the Church of Latter Day Saints abandoned polygamy as a part of official church doctrine in 1890. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
Spirit of Aloha Temple v County of Maui and Maui Planning Commission, 2016 WL 347298 (D. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:04 am by randywallace
  As a result, the case was remanded to the Chancery Court of Pontotoc County, Mississippi. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am by Dave Maass
Usually governments purchase products or licenses from vendors out of their budget or grants. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s grant in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
After Mesquite applied for permits to develop land zoned for church use, the Inspector determined that Mesquite’s proposed use did not meet the Pima County zoning code’s definition of “church. [read post]