Search for: "Circuit Check Inc" Results 261 - 280 of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2009, 6:39 am
The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently decided U.S. ex rel DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
The logic applied by the Circuit judge was that while Pliva, Inc. was unable to unilaterally fulfill their obligations as outlined by state tort law, they still had available options within the boundaries of federal law that could have made a difference. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:39 am by Bradley Gross
Maybe not, says the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in its recent decision in the case of Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
”  We hold further that trial courts have discretion to conduct a lodestar cross-check on a percentage fee, as the court did here; they also retain the discretion to forgo a lodestar cross-check and use other means to evaluate the reasonableness of a requested percentage fee. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:09 am by Jon Hyman
Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. (6th Cir. 6/30/10) [pdf], the 6th Circuit explains what it means for a claim to be reasonably related to or grow out of the factual allegations in the charge. [read post]
8 May 2010, 5:30 am
  For a different viewpoint on removal by counterclaim defendants, you may want to check out the following scholarly articles:   "How to Avoid Reaping What You Didn't Sow: CAFA's Solution for Removal of Counterclaim Class Actions," Consumer Financial Services Law Report, Volume 13, Issue 16, 2/2010;  A Move in the Right Direction - The Tide is Turning for Removal by Counterclaim Defendants Under CAFA,” BNA, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
Douglas had no obligation, as Talk America argued, to check the contract as published on the website and thereby discover any changes. [read post]