Search for: "Cisco Technology, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2008, 5:32 am
Such technology is enmeshed in products sold by Microsoft Corp., Cisco Systems Inc. and other industry giants.Giving regulators the power to reject foreign technologies could help to promote sales of Chinese alternatives. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper report – Making the… [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 5:55 am
Don Clark, in an article titled Start-Up Takes on 'Patent Trolls' begins:A San Francisco start-up [RPX] is disclosing details of a new service to address patent risks facing technology companies, and has lined up Cisco Systems Inc. and International Business Machines Corp. as initial members.You remember Cisco, the (former) home of patent troll tracker Rick Frenkel and home of Mallun Yen, the IP chief who is not a registered patent attorney.Clark… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:40 am
., Cisco Systems, Inc., JDS Uniphase Corp., Newport Corp., & Palomar Technologies, Inc., Case No. 1:08-cv-02993 (N.D. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences: (Managing… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:41 pm
Everyone who suggests any useful additional content will be put into a hat (well, their names will ...) and the lucky winner of a completely random draw will receive a copy for a prize.Via Reuters and the Wall Street Journal (thanks to Matthew Gilchrist) comes the news that Verizon Communications Inc, Google Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Hewlett-Packard Co and Ericsson are believed to be teaming up to defend themselves against potential patent-infringement lawsuits by… [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:46 pm
The standard documents of ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.) is only one of hundreds of instances of clients coming together to simplify and standardize. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:06 pm
Last month, John Danforth, former general counsel of Rambus and legal adviser published an article in the Legal Times that was highly critical of the FTC's "much ballyhooed but misguided antitrust case against Rambus Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:32 pm
., Cisco Systems, Inc., JDS Uniphase Corp., Newport Corp., and Palomar Technologies, Inc., No. 1:08-cv-01894 (N.D. [read post]
23 May 2008, 5:54 pm
Members of CFR include: Apple, Autodesk, Business Software Alliance, Chevron, Cisco Systems, Comcast, Dell, Electrolux, Google, Hewlett-Packard Company, Information Technology Industry Council, Intel, Micron Technology Inc., Microsoft, Oracle, Palm Inc., RIM, SAP, Seagate Technology, Symantec, TechNet, Time Warner and Visa. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:00 pm
From the Recorder: In March, a San Jose jury rejected claims by Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Micron Technology Inc. and Nanya Technology Corp. that Rambus violated antitrust laws. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic choices:… [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:47 pm
Rev. 1991 (2007) --> We are grateful to Apple Computer, Cisco Systems, Intel, Micron Technology, Microsoft, and SAP for funding the research reported in this Article.] [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:46 am
Rev. 1991 (2007) began: We are grateful to Apple Computer, Cisco Systems, Intel, Micron Technology, Microsoft, and SAP for funding the research reported in this Article. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:58 am
Lemley's "Patenting Nanotechnology" illustrates Lemley doesn't know jack about technology. [read post]