Search for: "Citizens United v. FEC"
Results 261 - 280
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am
Last Thursday's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:22 pm
FEC (08-248), a major new campaign finance case and a key sequel to the Supreme Court’s January ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:15 am
Citizens United did liberate corporate and union general-treasury funds to engage in independent election spending, but it did not otherwise change the constitutional architecture originally constructed in Buckley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
In an unusual move, the court ordered a re-hearing of Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am
Media attention has focused on Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:01 am
As discussed in the last paragraph, shareholder approval of campaign expenditures is not an adequate solution to the issue, at least from a corporate governance perspective. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:54 am
He wrote the majority opinion in FEC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:56 pm
Overturn Citizens United. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 11:28 am
That 2010 high court opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am
FEC, the en banc DC Circuit extended the reasoning of Citizens United from campaign spending to campaign donations, holding unconstitutional a $5000 limit on donations to independent political groups (the “527s”). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:22 am
FEC and NFIB v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:22 am
FEC and NFIB v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:21 am
The Supreme Court has overturned the prohibition on corporate money in campaigns, holding that corporations have the same First Amendment rights as people do. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:22 am
The order was issued in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:39 pm
Herrnson’s research shows that by the end of 2010 – less than 12 months after the landmark Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm
Back in April, this blog boldly predicted that the United States Supreme Court would exert little effort in dismissing the State of Montana’s effort to convince us that the Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Since the Supreme Court’s January decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm
The Shareholder Protection Act, HR 4790, responds to January’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
By Stefan Passantino The United States Supreme Court has recently announced that it might be revisiting its uber-controversial opinion Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
