Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 3:19 pm
City of Sacramento, 10 Cal. 4th 368, 376-77 (1995); City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
Richland of Los Angeles, answered that the Act is “extremely technical,” and interpretations of it by lower courts are “all across the board,” so it should not be understood as a promise of digital privacy. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
Taking Creed-21 up on its proposal, Walmart moved to compel Creed-21 to produce its PMQ, submitting to the court a recent hearing transcript from another Los Angeles Superior Court action in which Creed-21 was also represented by Briggs. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
Superior Court of Fresno County.) [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 12:08 pm
For example, the City of Oakland famously chose not to condemn the Raiders to prevent them from moving to Los Angeles, even though California courts ruled that it could. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am
After hearing post-trial motions, Judge Kleinberg in January 2014 ordered three defendant companies to pay $1.15 billion, to be shared among Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano and Ventura counties, and the cities of Oakland, San Diego and San Francisco. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
There was a news report on City AM. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
(County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 1987) However, the court is not required to accept as true `allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of fact, or unreasonable inferences. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:15 am
After her return to work, she filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court, asserting claims for sexual harassment, pregnancy discrimination, and retaliation under the FEHA. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 909.) [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
City of Joliet; Davis v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
Superior Court (City of Los Angeles), No. [read post]
