Search for: "Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 3:17 pm
(“Plaintiffs”) for May and June 2021 to proceed in-person, in San Francisco, California, instead take place remotely by videoconference under Rule 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
By The Harman Firm, P.C.Last Updated: December 8, 2014- Rank this Week: 747 http://www.newyorkemploymentattorneysblog.com/New York Personal Injury Law Blog [Feed] Covers the civil justice system, New York Courts, injury law cases and news. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:30 am
This procedural story began how most CAFA stories begin - plaintiffs filed suit in state court and defendants removed to federal court pursuant to CAFA. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
The amendment would bring the state expert discovery rule more in line with its companion federal rule of civil procedure and provide greater protections against expert discovery. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The decision rested on the determination made by the District Court that those proposing the class could not satisfy the “predominance” requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:28 am
Supreme Court was then finding in the federal Constitution. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
But now the federal government's case is truly dead.Two weeks ago the court of appeals ruled against federal lawyers, halting their effort to forfeit the mummy mask on procedural grounds. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
PerDiemCo LLC reads like my recent Civil Procedure final exam.[1] The topic is personal jurisdiction–when may a Federal Court exercise its power over an out-of-state patentee in a declaratory judgment action challenging the patent’s validity. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
Thus, when the issue arose in Picerni, the District Court considered whether a prohibition on private settlements for FLSA cases “runs afoul” of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:39 am
"See all stories on this topic BLOGS: SHOULD EVIDENCE OF PRIOR FALSE ABUSE ALLEGATIONS BE ADMISSIBLE IN ...By johntfloyd "Inadmissible Evidence under 608(b) of the Texas Rules of Evidence May be Admissible under 613(b), Rule 412 or Confrontation Clause By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair A Harris County federal jury recently awarded $5 ... [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:06 am
(Of course, when the Court examined Symczyk’s key assumption – that an unaccepted offer under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 mooted an individual claim – it rejected that assumption as well. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Georgia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:45 am
"Reports & journal articles:25 Years of Immigration Court Decisions (TRAC, March 2023) [text]"Bringing 'Civil'ity into Immigration Law: Using the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Fix Immigration Adjudication," Vanderbilt Law Review (Forthcoming) [preprint]Comments of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees on the Proposed Rule from the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:23 am
"See all stories on this topic BLOGS: Circle of 13: Undercover surveillance opsBy noreply@blogger.com (Peacedream) "Undercover policing has thus increasingly become a problem of criminal procedure, in which undercover tactics have come to be framed as threats to privacy, freedom of association, trial rights, and other civil liberties. ... [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:18 am
“A court has broad discretion to determine an appropriate sanction under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (hereafter “FRCP”)] 37(b), […] which may include an order directing that certain designated facts be taken as true. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm
Cuevas Segarra’s Treatise on Civil Procedure, Supplemental Edition. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 919 F.3d 699 (2d Cir. 2019) followed suit and unanimously affirmed snap removal as a procedural vehicle to remove to federal court. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:03 am
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1)(A) states: “[a]t an early practicable time after a person sues or is sued as a class representative, the court must determine by order whether to certify the action as a class action. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
My opponent (Gibsons) has argued that the federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide if the arbitration clause is unconscionable (see its Pacer documents 12 & 13). [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:56 pm
The blog learned earlier today that the petition, originally distributed for Friday’s conference, will in fact not be considered until a later conference. [read post]
