Search for: "Clark v. Secretary of State"
Results 261 - 280
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:03 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) CPS v F [2011] EWCA Crim 1844 (21 July 2011) McDonald v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1776 (21 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rees & Anor v Peters [2011] EWCA Civ 836 (21 July 2011) Finnerty & Anor v Clark & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 858 (21 July 2011) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Norton & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 834 (21 July 2011) Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
However, the Fourth District Appellate Court, in Clark v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) ?? [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am
Secretary State for Justice, seeks to assuage businesses that the parameters of the Act are not intended to prohibit reasonable client development activities: "Rest assured, -- no one wants to stop firms getting to know their clients by taking them to events like Wimbledon or the Grand Prix. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Kambadzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 23 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has decided by a majority that a failure to review the detention of an immigration detainee, in accordance with immigration policy, meant that his detention was unlawful. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
8 May 2011, 10:55 pm
Clarke also told the conference that states must “send the best possible judges to serve on the Court. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456 (20 April 2011) Court of appeal sends Zimbabwean asylum case back to tribunal as need more evidence as to whether they would have to lie about political beliefs. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
.); and (v) Art & Science – the many ways of epistemic insights.He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways in teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
