Search for: "Classic Productions, LLC"
Results 261 - 280
of 373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 5:28 pm
"We just did one, and they required we write a legal opinion explaining how LLCs worked in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
However, even if the letter of intent is a contract, it may be subject to a panoply of classical contract defenses such as the statute of frauds[8] (discussed later) and the parol evidence rule.[9][10] If the letter of intent is not a contract but nonetheless induced action or forbearance of the other party, it may be subject to a claim of promissory estoppel,[11] except that letters of intent which contain language that is expressly nonbinding may prevent plaintiffs from establishing… [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
Moye from giving such testimony); In re Rezulin Products Liab. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
Sorrell, however, made clear that content-based (and speaker-based) commercial speech restrictions must pass a stricter test than classic Central Hudson. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:43 am
Star Athletica, LLC, No. 10-cv-02508 (W.D. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” A fairly classic case of “remember the rubric, forget the rationale. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
Image Courtesy of Google Patents Streak Products v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:25 pm
See Productivity Software Int'l v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 2:00 pm
She received a $500 weekly base salary as well as managerial bonuses equaling a percentage of the gross profit from certain products sold in the store. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Loparex, LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 12:43 pm
Chem-Mod, LLC, 883 F.3d 1337 (Fed. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKY DINKS MAKER Price: $29.99 Manufacturer or Distributor: Big Time Toys, LLC Purchased: Kmart Age Recommendation: “Ages 8+” Warnings: “CAUTION: ELECTRIC TOY” and many more warnings on package, package insert and product. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
(There are lots and lots of trademark cases finding that failure on one of the key factors-mark similarity and product relatedness are the classic ones-is alone fatal to a trademark claim, even though the test is multifactor. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
Then there’s the likely destruction of perfectly good stock, the potential for inconvenience to consumers who use the injuncted product, and so on. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
Trendily Furniture, LLC case. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:11 am
This is still true in modern litigation, which can involve the production of voluminous and highly sensitive ESI. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
All descriptive terms “are intuitively linked to the product or service and thus might be easy for consumers to find using a search engine or telephone directory,” but they’re still registrable. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
He focused on the three-factor test created by the Ninth Circuit in Adaptive Power Solutions, LLC v .Hughes Missile Systems Co, 141 F. 3d 947, 950 (9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
Sony Music Entertainement – 42West, LLC, Paradigm Talent Agency, LLC, Epic Records, Inc., Bill Young Productions, Inc. and Sara Bareilles (Filed: August 19, 2014 as 1:2014cv06659) 05) Hayuk v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:25 am
Researchers can test the Team Production Theory empirically by determining whether the actual contracts match those asserted by the Team Production theorist. [read post]
