Search for: "Clear v. United States of America"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,v.PARRISH D. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
The program, known as the Pathogen Reduction/Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (PR/HACCP) regulation, was implemented following the 1993 outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 illnesses and deaths linked to undercooked hamburgers sold at Jack in the Box restaurants in the northwestern United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 5:46 am
In Nylander v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
The Supreme Court made clear in [Wilson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:01 am
., (TAOS) v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 9:25 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of New HampshireOpinion Date: 11/25/09Cite: ANSYS, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Millions sold in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
United States) and the other (Bolling v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
" Elliott v. [read post]