Search for: "Clemente v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:25 am
In New York v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:44 am
(The Ninth Circuit reached a similar conclusion in the Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Mr Clemente was debarred for procedural failings. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
Want to amaze your friends with your ability to predict the outcome of cases argued in the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm
At the end of the argument in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, and Florida v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
The United States files a brief that technically supports neither party, but in practical effect seems to provide considerable benefit to POM. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
No jurisdiction in the United States has a law like New York City's. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm
United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000). [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am
(At ACS blog, Jeffrey Clements disputes Citizens United’s criticism of the Kagan nomination.) [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:43 pm
Back in January, in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
I begin with this post, which first appeared here in October 2009, called "The Church, (P)ECUSA and the DFMS", with newly updated links and facts:* * * *I have been asked to explain the difference between "the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America" and the "Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
