Search for: "Commissioner v. Court Holding Co" Results 261 - 280 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am by Barry Sookman
This duty, which equity will enforce with an injunction, was described in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 as follows: ” If a man has in his possession or control goods the dissemination of which, whether in the way of trade or, possibly, merely by way of gifts (see Upmann v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am by Lyle Denniston
  It sent back to lower courts two cases, to reconsider in the wake of rulings by the Justices last week: Trainer Wortham & Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Parma School    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0594n.06 One Beacon Ins Co v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm by Guest Author
On January 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the closely watched case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am by The Health Law Firm
Supreme Court cases that “penal statutes are to be construed strictly, Commissioner v. [read post]