Search for: "Commissioner v. Court Holding Co." Results 261 - 280 of 782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The Supreme Court reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am by Barry Sookman
This duty, which equity will enforce with an injunction, was described in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 as follows: ” If a man has in his possession or control goods the dissemination of which, whether in the way of trade or, possibly, merely by way of gifts (see Upmann v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am by Lyle Denniston
  It sent back to lower courts two cases, to reconsider in the wake of rulings by the Justices last week: Trainer Wortham & Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Parma School    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0594n.06 One Beacon Ins Co v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am by Michael W. McConnell, Pamela S. Karlan
I think what the Supreme Court has to decide in the Trump case is whether to extend the immunity that they found in Nixon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm by Guest Author
On January 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the closely watched case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]