Search for: "Connecticut v. Massachusetts"
Results 261 - 280
of 719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
” In Liberian Community Association of Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
April 10, 2008).Connecticut: Hurley v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:57 pm
Health Insurance Massachusetts: On April 30, Massachusetts issued Bulletin 2020-15, which concerns health plan administrative procedures during the pandemic. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Connecticut, and continuing with Roe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:25 pm
Now 5 do: Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:42 pm
- Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Holding the Government to Its Promises: United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:21 am
Rosenberg of The McCormack Firm in his Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog Supreme Court preview: Baze v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:01 am
Six states in the US allow for trials before six or eight-person juries in felony cases: Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts and Utah. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:40 am
The case, Shay v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm
Delaware passed a law allowing the use of medical marijuana, while several other states, including Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Pennsylvania, considered but did not pass similar bills. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:43 pm
In State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Against All Saints Church in Attleboro, Massachusetts (MA) (plaintiff was the Diocese of Massachusetts; the case settled in 2007)37. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm
The starting point in that cycle was the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Now GLAD, the organization that won the same-sex marriage cases in the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts (2003) and Connecticut (2008), has brought a carefully constructed challenge to DOMA. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:36 am
” A finding that Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination as a form of sex discrimination would not affect employers and employees in states such as New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts that already prohibit such discrimination. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:52 am
Cascio v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
The case of Corporate Techs. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:41 am
While Judge Ramos' ruling breaks little new ground, it is significant because it applies to a case brought by seven states (New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Washington state and Virginia), and New York City. [read post]
