Search for: "Consumer Class Cases Plaintiffs"
Results 261 - 280
of 6,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
" The court of appeals rejected class status because Massachusetts consumer class action law requires that an unfair or deceptive act have caused similar injury to class members. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
For example, in a consumer fraud case, outside counsel should determine what law applies to the plaintiffs’ complaint (it might be different from that pleaded in the complaint and different from the law of the jurisdiction where the case was filed) and identify the elements of a consumer fraud claim under that state’s laws. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
For example, in a consumer fraud case, outside counsel should determine what law applies to the plaintiffs’ complaint (it might be different from that pleaded in the complaint and different from the law of the jurisdiction where the case was filed) and identify the elements of a consumer fraud claim under that state’s laws. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm
Ashford Gear LLC, Case No. 11-8020, 2011 U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:35 am
The only difference is that White’s consumer lawsuit is the first to seek to represent a class of similarly situated plaintiffs against Capital Brands. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:30 pm
Hitachi removed the case. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:50 pm
Plaintiffs moved for certification of two nationwide classes under the unfair and deceptive trade practice laws of more than thirty states.Holdings: The District Court, Saris, J., held that:(1) requirement of state UDTPAs that a plaintiff prove reliance did not preclude certification of nationwide class of third-party payors (TPPs) under MediGap supplemental insurance plans;(2) nationwide class of consumer and third-party payors for Medicare… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm
What it does is favor class arbitration by holding, in some cases, that class arbitration waivers are unconscionable. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
Three cases have been quickly dismissed, likely as a result of settlements between the retailers and the named plaintiffs. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:24 am
A live controversy therefore no longer exists, and the court must dismiss the case if no other plaintiff steps into the named plaintiff’s shoes to represent the class. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm
A recent New Hampshire case provides yet another example of the difficulty of establishing predominance for class certification purposes in advertising/consumer deception cases. [read post]
9 May 2009, 2:23 pm
" Id. at 12.These findings are well within the majority ruld rejecting consumer fraud damages class actions in cases involving prescription drugs. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:58 am
" Slip op. at 29.Allowing "plaintiffs [to] prove collective damages on a class-wide basis, and individual plaintiffs would then [to] claim shares of this fund ... [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
It held that Paragraph 12 was "plainly deceptive and misleading to an unsophisticated consumer as a matter of law" and remanded the case for further proceedings. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:50 pm
Among the observations made in the article: Although class arbitration waivers were upheld in 76 cases, plaintiffs were successful in invalidating arbitration clauses in several key cases, mostly on various federal law grounds. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:57 pm
While a related case sets forth parallel allegations on behalf of consumers who purchased iPod’s directly from Apple, see The Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation, U.S.D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
The plaintiffs urged the court to adjudicate the claims of a nationwide class under California law. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
The defendant argued that a public interest organization like plaintiff was only permitted to bring a DCCPPA action “on behalf of the interests of a consumer or class of consumers. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
July 27, 2022), the Eleventh Circuit heard an appeal by an objector from a final approval of a class action settlement in a case under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:08 am
The federal court further noted, “the Westrup Klick firm has had trouble regarding its choice of plaintiffs in the past” and characterized this class action as “one more example of plaintiff’s counsel’s improper approach to consumer litigation. [read post]
