Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C" Results 261 - 280 of 7,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2023, 9:56 am by Gene Takagi
A director should keep the corporation’s private information confidential. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:57 pm by Michael Oykhman
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence  According to s.340 of the Criminal Code: Destroying documents of title 340 Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who, for a fraudulent purpose, destroys, cancels, conceals or obliterates (a) a document of title to goods or lands, (b) a valuable security or testamentary instrument, or (c) a judicial… [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:00 am by Liz Dunshee
In order to facilitate its IPO, Bumble installed an  “Up-C” structure, which resulted in a hybrid entity in which public stockholders’ enjoyed voting & economic rights through ownership of Class A shares, while pre-IPO insiders enjoyed voting rights through  ownership of Class B shares and economic rights through the ownership of their pre-IPO LLC units, each of which were convertible, when accompanied by a Class B share, into shares of… [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On September 27, 2023, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Division of Corporation Finance issued 10 new Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the pay-versus-performance (PVP) disclosure rules adopted last year. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 4:41 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Eisner: To survive a Rule 23.1 motion to dismiss in a due care case where an expert has advised the board in its decisionmaking process, the complaint must allege particularized facts (not conclusions) that, if proved, would show, for example, that: (a) the directors did not in fact rely on the expert; (b) their reliance was not in good faith; (c) they did not reasonably believe that the expert's advice was within the expert's professional competence; (d) the expert was… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:25 am by David Lynn
If an issuer does not price an offering within the 15-day time period provided in Rule 430(a), the Staff indicates that the issuer may file post-effective amendments, as necessary, under Rule 462(c) to restart the 15-business-day period so that, at the time of pricing, the issuer will be able to include the pricing information in a Rule 424(b) prospectus supplement. 8. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 12:15 am
  In fact, Subdivision (c) has no analogue in any other entity provision of the California Corporations Code. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[9] Section 692.203 applies the same prohibition to real property within ten miles of any “military installation”[10]or “critical infrastructure facility” (such as airports, seaports, power plants, or refineries).[11] Section 692.204 goes further, specifically targeting China by prohibiting certain China-related persons from “directly or indirectly own[ing], hav[ing] a controlling interest in, or acquir[ing] by purchase, grant, devise or descent” any real… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 12:25 pm by Stephen Honig
  Grade B, C and even A-minus city properties and malls anywhere are at risk and candidates for repurposing or demolition. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:14 am by Unknown
The court explained that an Up-C structure allows the public to participate in a company both economically and in governance through Class A shares, while insiders participate economically through their LLC units and in governance through Class B shares. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:17 pm by Francis Pileggi
Background The source of the litigation began in 2015, when GoDaddy completed an Up-C IPO, a structure which the court said, “layers a parent- level corporation on top of a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for tax purposes” and has a member interest in the LLC divided into a number of units – some of which are owned by GoDaddy and some by public and private equity investors. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
N/A The term “Large” applies to a company or, where that company is a parent of a consolidated group, a group meeting two of the following tests: (a) balance sheet total exceeding EUR 20 million; (b) net turnover exceeding EUR 40 million; and (c) more than 250 employees. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
N/A The term “Large” applies to a company or, where that company is a parent of a consolidated group, a group meeting two of the following tests: (a) balance sheet total exceeding EUR 20 million; (b) net turnover exceeding EUR 40 million; and (c) more than 250 employees. [read post]