Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 31,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
According to an Ohio Supreme Court news release, what he bill actually does is: "... allow clerks of court to “write off” uncollectible debt after five years; allow trial courts to suspend the imposition or payment of court costs after the court has imposed a sentence (in response to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 7:45 am
ShareIn 2018, in Janus v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:01 am
The Act states that “the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:29 am
R (National Grid Gas plc) v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
The judge was not persuaded by the Defendant’s reason for not doing so, stating “[9]…To my mind, somebody making an offer of this sort who includes an offer for the costs to date has all the protection they could reasonably expect by reason of the assessment regime which will have regard to reasonableness of costs and proportionality. [read post]
Supreme Court to Again Consider the Interplay Between a CERCLA Cost Recovery and Contribution Action
2 Apr 2021, 6:24 am
See Guam v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:57 pm
PROPERTY – HOMEOWNERS – TWO-YEAR REPAIR/REPLACEMENT DEADLINE – REPLACEMENT COST COVERAGE Mateyunas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:22 am
The case is Pin-Pon Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:34 pm
In today’s case (Cathcart v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:42 pm
Originally posted on : Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:49 am
Vanaskie, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals addressed a Defendant's request submitted to a Plaintiff for the payment of costs associated with e-discovery in the case of Race Tires America, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:57 pm
At paragraph 5 he stated: There is nothing in the conduct of Mr. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:11 am
However, a well respected treatise on Washington insurance law subsequently criticized this aspect of Holly Mountain as being inconsistent with the principles stated in Tank v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 pm
The SCOTUS's decision in Williamson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:30 am
Newfield Exploration Company v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:17 am
Pliego v. [read post]
