Search for: "Cotton v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2025, 10:15 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Koblitz —Since the induced infringement finding in GSK v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Those cotton-tipped swabs aren't labeled for removing ear wax.Physicians are permitted to make off-label use of drugs and devices and, to our eyes, off-label use does not affect the preemption analysis.First, Riegel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the Court of International Trade. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Sundquist. ** After examining for the twenty-first time — as it has at every Conference since September — a case on the role of federal appeals courts in state habeas cases, the Court once again took no action on Ryan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Angie Gou
Tom Cotton, R-Ark., criticized Prelogar for her role in the shifting positions. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by admin
In Southern Cotton Oil v Anderson, the precedent-setting case from 1920, Florida Supreme Court justices decided that cars were inherently dangerous. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
That question was answered in 1936, by the Beaumont Court of Appeals in the case, Love et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Susan I. Nelson
Alabama still can’t bar them from enrolling, since the Supreme Court declared in Plyler v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
Cotton, 13-551, a qualified immunity claim arising in the case of a man shot because of a license-plate typo, and Martinez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]