Search for: "Council v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 10,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 3:20 am
McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-434/09); [2011] WLR (D) 153 “Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC was not applicable to a European Union citizen who had never exercised their right of free movement, who had always resided in a member state of which they were a national and who was also a national of another member state. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:20 am
Amid the awful account of human suffering and international inertia contained in the just-released Report of the High-Level Mission on Darfur may be found an intriguing theory of state responsibility, a matter of recent concern in the Bosnia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 4:22 am
As noted here last Sunday, Dec. 10th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in Clark County Council v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am
In Kunitsyna v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:01 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 is available on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 10:08 am
It's actually not 100% fictitious as some vested interests would like to overturn eBay v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:02 am
Association belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and others v Conseil des ministres (Case C-236/09); [2011] WLR (D) 67 “Article 5(2) of Council Directive 2004/113/EC was invalid with effect from 21 December 2012 since it permitted European Union law and consequently member states’ laws, to derogate from the principle of equal treatment of men and women, guaranteed by articles 21 and 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, without… [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:46 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Smarden Parish Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2010] EWHC 701 (Admin) (30 March 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
Here are the materials in Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Here is the order in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:54 am
eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10); [2011] WLR (D) 330 “Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was… [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:32 am
Here are the new materials in In re Galanda v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 6:08 am
Here are the materials in Council for Tribal Employment Rights v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:43 am
Supreme Court Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 13 (21 March 2012) ST Eritrea, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 12 (21 March 2012) Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11 (21 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mohamed v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 331 (20 March 2012) Kennedy v Charity Commission [2012]… [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
Expanding on the Supreme Court’s decision on the first argument, Lord Clarke stated that the only question is whether the maps were drawn to a scale of not less than 1:25,000 and held that they were. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:05 am
In Gundy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The Second Circuit agreed, stating "We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The Second Circuit agreed, stating "We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. [read post]
