Search for: "Cross v. Bear" Results 261 - 280 of 2,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2007, 5:28 pm
Woodford, et al., also bearing No. 06-16154, originally filed Aug. 29, 2007, and withdrawn on November 13, 2007, after crossing petitions for rehearing. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:43 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg In a supervised release revocation hearing, the Third Circuit notes a circuit split regarding the admission of hearsay evidence without a showing of cause for the declarant's absence at the revocation hearing; Third circuit agrees with other circuits that hearsay is not per se admissible in a revocation proceeding and that, under due process standards, "a releasee may have a legitimate interest in confrontation and cross-examination… [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
In 2004, it began selling shirts and caps bearing the subject marks, purchasing the items from an Illinois company. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Garrow, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Bearing the Cross and Rising Star“Highly original and made vivid by close readings of both well-known and little-known texts, The Burning House traces the emergence of ‘Southern pluralist views’ that ‘respected diversity and also tolerated inequality. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by INFORRM
The Appeal The Claimants appealed their award of damages while the Defendant cross-appealed the finding of liability. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
Portland Natural Gas Transmission Sys. v. 19.2 Acres of Land in Haverhill, 195 F.Supp.2d 314 (D.Mass. 2002) aff'd 318 F.3d 279 (1st Cir. 2003).What does this mean for landowners in Berkshire and Franklin Counties whose properties the underground pipeline might cross? [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:16 pm
  (Rendell, Chagares, and Jordan, Circuit Judges)       In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
Portland Natural Gas Transmission Sys. v. 19.2 Acres of Land in Haverhill, 195 F.Supp.2d 314 (D.Mass. 2002) aff'd 318 F.3d 279 (1st Cir. 2003).What does this mean for landowners in Berkshire and Franklin Counties whose properties the underground pipeline might cross? [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
  The BGH's decision could therefore affect litigation strategies in cross border trademark infringement scenarios. [read post]