Search for: "Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield"
Results 261 - 280
of 351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 2:22 pm
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of N.J., an employee made an internal complaint of wrongdoing and shortly thereafter was fired. [read post]
29 May 2011, 8:07 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
See Sparks v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
’s Cross-Mot. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
The involvement of Blue Cross Blue Shield raises concerns about a potential conflict of interest as private insurers use Medicare’s coverage determinations in setting their own coverage limits. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
Existing Homes Rose 2.1% in February Harry & David, Blockbuster, Madoff, Lehman: Bankruptcy Tullow Says Ghana Well Finds Hydrocarbons Close to Jubilee Gbagbo Supporters Rally in Abidjan for Incumbent Ivorian Leader Blue Cross Blue Shield Probe Expanded by Justice Department Story Tools e-mail this story print this story add to Business Exchange By Bill Rochelle (This report contains items about… [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
The action is notable because it is the first unilateral conduct case brought under Sec. 2 of the Sherman Act in over a decade and because it is the first case brought by the Antitrust Division in the health care sector since the October 2010 civil antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:29 pm
But OPM then decided that Blue Cross/Blue Shield could not be ordered to provide the coverage, because that would violate the ban in DOMA. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
BCBS Association, et al., Case Number 09 C 5619United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois On January 21, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed the counterclaims of 23 Blue Cross/Blue Shield entities seeking recoupment of "overpayments" allegedly made to the plaintiff chiropractors. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:44 pm
In Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mass. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich., the Sixth Circuit observed that plan-wide claims are distinct from claims seeking to correct the denial of individual benefits. 409 F.3d 710, 718 (6th Cir. 2005). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:05 am
The court said that the age 65+ retirees are individuals who have been treated differently by their employer with respect to [their] compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.The court said that the fact that the county’s action was the result neither of some malevolent motive nor due to some hostile age-based stereotypes was irrelevant.Also of some significance is the Court’s rejection of the County’s argument that “... the underwriting criteria adopted by… [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, 42 So.3d 1216 (Ala. 2010). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Seeks Dismissal of Government Antitrust SuitThis posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan has asked the federal district court in Detroit to dismiss an antitrust suit brought by the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:29 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield Of Michigan, No. 08-1085 (6th Cir. 2010), the defendant, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan ("BCBSM") was a fiduciary of a self-funded health care plan (the "Plan"), which was maintained by Flagstar Bank for its employees and their families. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
., (the Act) in 1994 to allow Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) to purchase the state accident fund, a for-profit workers’ compensation insurer, BCBSM formed the Accident Fund as a wholly-owned, for-profit Michigan stock insurance subsidy. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
KeySpan Corporation (CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶50,975).In addition, the Division filed civil antitrust lawsuits against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and (together with seven states) against American Express, MasterCard, and Visa.In the first suit, the Division challenged “most-favored nations” (MFN) clauses in Blue Cross’s agreements with hospitals that allegedly limit the discounts the hospitals can offer to… [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am
But the DOJ’s recent announcement of case against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan looks like the DOJ’s first major “exclusionary” conduct case — despite the fact that it is brought under Section of the Sherman Act rather than Section 2 (there is also a state antitrust law claim). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:38 am
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield (D. [read post]
