Search for: "Currie v. Currie" Results 261 - 280 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2015, 2:39 am by Matthias Weller
Ian Curry-Sumner, Voorts Juridische Diensten, presented thoughts on a possible future recast of Brussels II bis. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
The approach taken in Eagle v Chambers once again supplies the answer. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has granted a Habeas Corpus petition filed by a man who was found guilty in 1993 for killing his former girlfriend, ruling that his attorney did not effectively represent him at trial.The case is Rivas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Repercussions of law: allegations against Malaysia for cultural theft of batik, beef curry, dances, etc. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But he’s the assistant secretary and a fair percentage of the people reading this blog envision him as sporting devil horns like Tim Curry in Legend. v. # 12 Hon. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by Liz Overton
Non-Compete Agreements/Competition with Former Employer In Curry’s Transportation Services, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:36 pm by CJLF Staff
v=HMQCFqgAGyM&sns=em It includes his statement that Holder threw law enforcement under the bus to curry favor with racial groups such as the New Black Panther Party. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 Yesterday’s speech by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Sajid Javid was obviously intended to curry favour with journalists, but was filled with predictable conservative rhetoric on human rights. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 Yesterday’s speech by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Sajid Javid was obviously intended to curry favour with journalists, but was filled with predictable conservative rhetoric on human rights. [read post]