Search for: "D. R.C. D." Results 261 - 280 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am by MBettman
”) Ohio Constitution, Article II, Section 15(D) (“No bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
" This prompted the teacher, Elizabeth Carle, to tell the assistant principal, Carl D. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am by Alexandra L. Arko
Ohio’s criminal revenge porn statute, R.C. 2917.211, prohibits “revenge pornography” as a form of harassment. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am by Alexandra L. Arko
Ohio’s criminal revenge porn statute, R.C. 2917.211, prohibits “revenge pornography” as a form of harassment. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 2929.13 (F)(6) (A first or second-degree felony sentence must be mandatory if the defendant had a prior conviction for another first or second degree felony, or any other equivalent offense) R.C. 2901.08 (a juvenile adjudication is a conviction for purposes of determining the offense with which the person should be charged and, if the person is convicted of or pleads guilty to an offense, the sentence to be imposed upon the person relative to the conviction or guilty… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am by MBettman
R.C. 2903.01(B) (No person shall purposely cause the death of another . . . after committing or attempting to commit… rape…) R.C. 2929.03(D)(3) (If, after receiving the trial jury’s recommendation that the sentence of death be imposed, the court finds, by proof beyond a reasonable doubt…that the aggravating circumstances the offender was found guilty of committing outweigh the mitigating factors, it shall impose the sentence of death on the… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am by MBettman
 At issue is whether the mandatory transfer of juveniles to adult court pursuant to R.C. 2152.10(A)(2)(b) and R.C. 2152.12(A)(1)(b) is unconstitutional. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm by cdw
The next issue will focus on a few odds and ends, with no “win” yet jumping out at me. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 1303.31(outlining the requirements of a “Person entitled to enforce” an instrument as any of the following: (1) The holder of the instrument, (2) A nonholder in possession of the instrument who has the rights of a holder, or (3) A person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to section 1303.38 or division (D) of section 1303.58 of the Revised Code.) [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am by Eric Goldman
The trial court had ruled it was valid, a ruling not challenged on appeal, but I’d love to know more about this. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by MBettman
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[d]ue process of law is the primary and indispensable foundation of individual freedom. [read post]