Search for: "DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v ESTATE OF" Results 261 - 280 of 444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2017, 4:37 am by John Mikhail
      Chapter VIII (“Of the King’s Revenue”) 4. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
The bankruptcy trustee in this case determined which portion of the debtors’ tax refund should go to the bankruptcy estate by dividing it into prepetition and postpetition portions, with the postpetition portion going to the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Halse v Halse, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 850604 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am by Aaron Weems
  Since then she’s been refused certain spousal benefits and is required to pay inheritance taxes on Underwood’s estate; issues which, ironically, are nearly identical to those raised by Edith Winsor in the seminal same-sex marriage case, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
The type of assets owned by the corporation is also a factor, e.g., a bond is less likely for a real estate holding company with substantial equity in its properties. [read post]