Search for: "DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v ESTATE OF" Results 261 - 280 of 444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am by SHG
A room at the George V in Paris is going to cost you big time, but then, you knew that going in and chose to run up such a tab. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am by Aaron Weems
  Since then she’s been refused certain spousal benefits and is required to pay inheritance taxes on Underwood’s estate; issues which, ironically, are nearly identical to those raised by Edith Winsor in the seminal same-sex marriage case, United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Petitioners named and cited as interested parties, in addition to the charitable and noncharitable residuary legatees, the Attorney General of the State of New York (AG), the United States Treasury Department--Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the New York State Tax Commission (Commission). [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:02 am by SELadmin
Couples in same-sex marriages are entitled to the same favorable tax treatment as other married couples, for purposes of inheritance and transfer tax in Pennsylvania, according to a bulletin issued by the Department of Revenue. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Griggs County Social Services, 499 N.W.2d 876 (N.D. 1993); Department of Income Maintenance v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:26 am by Daniel Shaviro
 Too much water under the bridge at this point (even before we get to see what they do in King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
The type of assets owned by the corporation is also a factor, e.g., a bond is less likely for a real estate holding company with substantial equity in its properties. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:35 am
  Bethany Bartlett is a Partner in the firm's Real Estate Department and chair of the firm's Solar Energy Practice Group. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
 Last week, Justice Kornreich released her 32-page decision in Zelouf International Corp. v Zelouf, 2014 NY Slip Op 51462(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Oct. 6, 2014], fixing the fair value of the 25% stock interest at $2.2 million and awarding additional “damages” of another $2.2 million on the “quasi-derivative” claims for waste and self-dealing. [read post]