Search for: "DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED."
Results 261 - 280
of 446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
JACOB MATTHEW PARRISH, Appellee. 2nd District.Injunctions -- Wrongful injunction -- Recovery against injunction bond -- Plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of its complaint without prejudice after temporary injunction had expired by its own terms did not constitute an automatic determination that defendants had been wrongfully enjoined so as to entitle them to damages against bond -- Plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of its suit without prejudice after it has sought and… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:57 am
The only party with any connection to California is McKesson, and it has next to nothing to do with any issues in the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Whitfield asks how much movement is required before a victim during a bank robbery has been forced to “accompany” the robber, which in this case earned Mr. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
It’s interesting to me that the Supreme Court has decided to address the issue itself rather than remanding it to a lower court. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
There has been speculation about the possibility of such a petition. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The Justices, rather than resolving the merits—which the Court had the power to do—then sent the case back to the D.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
” Under the decisions of Octane Fitness and Highmark, the award has now been reinstated and the case remanded back to the Federal Circuit Court for reconsideration in light of these decisions. [read post]
17 May 2014, 7:49 am
The Board acknowledged that a written order and docket entry would’ve been far preferable. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
The operative application for divorce would be the March 28th, 2012, amended complaint at Docket Entry 109. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
Student Contributor Cameron Downer has written this summary of the significant aspects of the case. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm
Nothing R. can do will erase his employment history. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm
Although historically, the “distinctive purpose” of forcible entry proceedings has been to regain possession of the property, that purpose has expanded slightly in Illinois. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Thus, generally, cross motions do not "'obviate a plenary trial of disputed issues of fact, where such exists; nor do cross-motions constitute a waiver by the litigants to such a trial.'" [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
We suspect the clerkerati will use the winter break to put finishing touches an opinion (or, likelier still, opinions), and we will at long last find out what has been holding this case up. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
Typically, the urge, need, or desire to appeal arises after a final judgment has been entered against the Defendant. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Now that the Court has dismissed Cline, the question becomes what to do with Pruitt. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
EOIR has been advised to "put its shutdown plans in place." [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:46 pm
This covers two other cases that have been filed which were previously mentioned.... [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm
To review these two Supreme Court case dockets, go here: Wurie (docket 13-212) and Riley (13-132). [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
New York has the longest history. [read post]
